Every tool you get,
held to one standard.
One membership covers the whole catalog — APOLLO ONE and every indicator built after it, at the same price. Every slot in it is named after a question you have actually asked yourself at the chart, not after the formula inside it.
You are the one who has to trust what sits on your chart at 9:31, so the gate each tool has to clear is published below rather than described. And the honest status today, up front: nothing in the catalog has shipped yet — membership opens in step with the releases, not ahead of them.
APOLLO ONE
The one that came first and set the bar, and the one you get on day one. It reads the chart and hands you a single complete plan — entry, a structural stop, targets at graded levels, and the contract count your own risk budget allows. And it says no, out loud, when there is no trade.
Every slot is a question
a trader actually asks.
This is the whole plan, in the open. Each one is named by the question it has to answer, not by the formula inside it — and it only earns a place here if that question is worth asking. They fill in as they clear the gate below.
First wave
The references you need before anything else — and the cheapest things to get rightATR & Volatility Regime
Next upHow volatile is this market, and is volatility expanding or contracting?
Sessions, Opening Range & Initial Balance
Next upWhat happened at the open, and which session references matter now?
Relative Volume at Time
Next upIs participation unusual for this exact point in the session?
Previous Session Structure
Next upWhich prior day, week and session levels still matter?
Futures Risk & Position Sizer
Next upHow many contracts fit this stop and this risk budget?
Anchored VWAP Toolkit
Next upWhere is volume-weighted value, measured from an anchor that means something?
Second wave
Context and state — what kind of market you are actually inMTF Trend Context
PlannedWhat do the higher timeframes say, without repainting or clutter?
Range & Compression State
PlannedIs the market balancing, compressing, or expanding?
RSI Context
PlannedIs this persistent trend momentum, ordinary stretch, or a transition?
Gap Lifecycle
PlannedWhich gaps are unresolved, partly filled, filled, or long dead?
Structure and events
The things that generate setups, tracked as objects with a life rather than as drawingsDivergence Integrity Engine
PlannedIs there a confirmed, non-repainting divergence worth noticing?
Support/Resistance Lifecycle
PlannedWhich levels are fresh, tested, broken, flipped, or retired?
Breakout Quality
ResearchIs this break being accepted, or failing?
Breakout Retest Tracker
ResearchDid the retest hold, fail, or quietly lose acceptance?
FVG Lifecycle
PlannedWhich imbalances are unfilled, and what state are they in?
Market Structure BOS/CHoCH
PlannedWhich swing breaks and structural transitions are confirmed?
Supply/Demand Zone Lifecycle
PlannedWhich zones are fresh, tested, broken, flipped, or invalidated?
Auto Fibonacci Anchor Tool
PlannedWhere are the retracements, measured from swings that were confirmed?
Pivot & Reference Level Suite
PlannedWhere are the widely followed arithmetic reference levels?
Trendline & Channel Auto-Mapper
Under reviewWhich geometric trend structures are objectively present?
Pattern Structure Suite
Under reviewAre there objectively defined flags, wedges, triangles or broadening structures?
Trend, momentum and the classics
Standard tools, implemented properly and honest about what they cannot tell youTrend Health
ResearchHow healthy is this trend, really?
Bollinger Context
PlannedIs this band event stretch, trend persistence, or volatility expansion?
ADX/DMI Trend Strength State
PlannedIs directional movement strong, weak, strengthening, or conflicting?
Regression Channel + Z-Score
PlannedHow extended is price against its own local trend?
Relative Strength vs Benchmark
PlannedIs this symbol leading or lagging its benchmark?
Session VWAP & Deviation Bands
PlannedWhere is today’s value, and how far from it are we?
SuperTrend Context
ResearchCan the flips be made less noisy without hiding the lag?
MACD Momentum State
ResearchIs momentum accelerating, decelerating, or changing regime?
MA Ribbon & Trend State
PlannedWhat is the direction and organisation of these moving averages?
Donchian Breakout Channel
PlannedHas price broken a defined rolling range?
Ichimoku Clean MTF
PlannedCan Ichimoku be shown with clear multi-timeframe meaning and less clutter?
Participation and session statistics
Whether what you are seeing is normal for this market, at this time of dayTime-of-Day Volatility & Range
PlannedIs this range unusual for this minute, hour or session?
Session Statistics Dashboard
PlannedHow does today compare with how this market usually behaves?
Relative Strength / Ratio Matrix
PlannedWhich assets or sectors are leading and lagging?
Volume Activity & Surge Map
PlannedWhere is volume unusually high against recent and session norms?
Volume Profile Lite
Under reviewWhere did trading actually concentrate by price?
Stochastic / Williams %R Lab
PlannedWhere is price within its recent range?
MFI / OBV / CMF Participation Panel
PlannedWhat do the classic price-volume proxies say?
Execution economics
The part almost nobody builds — what the trade costs you and what is left in itTrailing Stop & Trade Manager
PlannedHow do I manage this live without losing track of R?
Target & R:R Planner
PlannedWhat is the reward against the risk, to targets I choose?
Chase / Stretch Gauge
ResearchAm I late — against volatility, structure, and what is left in the move?
Research frontier
Open questions. These do not get built until the evidence exists, and some may never shipFootprint Auction Map
ResearchWhere are intrabar value, delta and imbalance developing?
Acceptance / Rejection State
ResearchIs price being accepted beyond this reference, or rejected back through it?
Market State Map
ResearchIs this market trending, balancing, transitioning, compressing, or expanding?
Momentum Transition / Pressure
ResearchIs directional pressure persisting, fading, or reversing?
Pullback Quality
ResearchIs this pullback normal, damaged, or the trend actually turning?
Exhaustion vs Repricing
ResearchIs this extreme exhausting, or is the market repricing?
Two more were on the internal list and were cut rather than shipped: a Parabolic SAR utility and a standalone CCI. In both cases we could not name one thing we would add to the original, so they do not get a slot. That decision is the whole point of this page.
Why you can trust what
lands on your chart.
You are going to put these on a chart you trade real money from. So here is the whole process every one of them has to clear before it reaches you — in order, as it actually runs, not a marketing summary of one. None of it is optional, and the last step is a person deciding it is good enough.
- 1 — It is classified before it is started. Which of the four speeds it belongs to, decided up front, because that decides how much evidence it owes.
- 2 — Its baseline is named. The existing tool it is measured against. Anything that cannot name one is a classic, and is held to being excellent rather than to being new.
- 3 — Its added value is stated, with evidence that already exists. One sentence on what information it adds, pointing at work already done — not at work we intend to do. If that sentence cannot be written, the build does not start.
- 4 — It is assembled from audited parts. Shared components rather than a fresh copy-paste each time, so a fix to one is a fix to all.
- 5 — It passes the fleet rules. A machine check, every time: every setting documented, the required disclaimers present, no performance claim anywhere in the code, and the source of every idea declared.
- 6 — Its provenance is declared. Where the logic came from, in plain language. We do not quietly re-publish someone else’s work, and we say so in the tool itself.
- 7 — It is loaded on a real chart and watched. Compiling is not working. It has to run on live data without faulting before anyone sees it.
- 8 — A human says it is ready. The final gate is not a test suite. It is a person who trades deciding this is good enough to put their name on.
Nothing has cleared step 8 yet. That is why there are no download links on this page, and why membership opens in step with the releases rather than ahead of them — when a slot flips, it flips here first, from the same data this page is built from.
Learn the tool while
you use it.
Every reading in a Trader’s Edge tool is built to be hovered, and what comes back is not a glossary entry — it is composed from the live numbers, about the bar in front of you. Four clauses, in the same order, in every product, so once you have learned to read one of our tools you have learned to read all of them.
It is a build requirement, not a nicety: a build check refuses a tool built to our design kit whose readouts cannot explain themselves. That is why it is the same across the line instead of being good in the tools somebody happened to care about. APOLLO ONE predates the standard and does not carry it yet.
- What it reads. The input, in plain language, before any formula — because you should not need the maths to use the tool.
- How it is computed. The actual calculation, with the window and the sample it was measured over. No proprietary black box, and nothing you have to take on faith.
- Why that information matters. The decision it is supposed to change. If a reading cannot answer this, it should not be on your chart, and we cut it rather than ship it.
- What it does not tell you. The clause everyone else drops. A number that hides its limits is how a trader comes to lean on it far harder than it can carry.
What we won’t do.
These are easier to promise than to keep, so they are written down here where you can check them against anything we ever publish.
no win rates, no profit claims
Not on a tool, not on a page, not in a video. If we ever show a number, it will come
with what it was measured on and what it does not prove.
no race to a bigger catalog
Shipping more tools per month is not a goal. A tool exists because it answers a
question, or it does not exist.
free means complete, not crippled
A free tool is not a demo with the useful part removed. If we charge for something one
day, it will be for a bigger job, not for unlocking a primitive.
no borrowed work, unattributed
Where an idea comes from somebody else’s published work, the tool says so. Provenance
is a build requirement here, not a courtesy.
One membership.
Every indicator.
$49.99 a month, and the catalog grows into it — the price does not move as tools land. Checkout asks for your TradingView username, because that is how access is granted.
Every tool ships through the newsletter first, with the reasoning behind it, so subscribing is how you hear the moment the first one clears the gate. That part costs nothing.