Ticker by TradingView
Free tools · Glossary

Glossary: the words our tools print.

Four questions, in the same order, for every word: what it reads, how it is computed, why that information matters, and what it does not tell you. Each one comes with a worked number, and none of them is a forecast.

Tap a dotted word to read its entry where you are: , , , or . The same words open the same way across our free tools.

Want more market insights? Get the free newsletter →

· the last change to its entries

Sessions and levels

Where a trading day starts and ends, and the words for what price has already done at a level.

Exchange session

Also written: trading session · trading day

What it reads
The window the exchange itself defines as one trading day for a symbol, start to end, in its own timezone.
How it is computed
Read from the symbol’s declared hours and the timezone database, so daylight saving moves with the exchange.
Why that information matters
Every daily level, range and running total is cut at this boundary. A wrong boundary moves all of them.
What it does not tell you
It is a calendar fact. It says nothing about whether a session will be busy, quiet or worth trading.
Worked example

CME equity futures open 18:00 ET Sunday to Thursday and close 17:00 ET the next day.

→ A bar at 19:30 ET on Monday belongs to Tuesday’s session, which runs 23 hours.

Used byTE Session Boundaries, Opening Range and Initial Balance (TradingView) · Market hours

See alsoETH (extended trading hours) · RTH (regular trading hours)

ETH (extended trading hours)

Also written: ETH · Globex session · overnight session · electronic trading hours

What it reads
The whole electronic session, including the hours outside the regular stock-market day.
How it is computed
From the session open to its close on the exchange clock: for CME equity futures 18:00 to 17:00 ET, with a 60-minute break.
Why that information matters
Levels built on ETH include the overnight trade, so they can sit at different prices from the same levels built on RTH.
What it does not tell you
It does not say how much traded overnight. Thin hours count the same as busy ones.
Worked example

An ES session with an overnight high of 5,042.00 and a regular-hours high of 5,031.50.

→ ETH high 5,042.00, RTH high 5,031.50: a 10.50-point difference in the same day.

Used byTE Session Boundaries, Opening Range and Initial Balance (TradingView) · Market hours

See alsoRTH (regular trading hours) · Exchange session

RTH (regular trading hours)

Also written: RTH · regular session · day session · cash session

What it reads
The slice of the session that matches US stock-market hours: 09:30 to 16:00 ET for US equity products.
How it is computed
A clock window on the exchange calendar. For a CME equity future, a slice of the longer electronic session.
Why that information matters
Opening ranges and prior-day levels are often cut from RTH alone, so the window behind a level changes its meaning.
What it does not tell you
It is a time window, not a measurement. An early-close day is still RTH while it lasts.
Worked example

ES regular session, 09:30 to 16:00 ET, on a full trading day.

→ 6.5 hours: 390 one-minute bars, against 1,380 in the 23-hour electronic session.

Used byTE Session Boundaries, Opening Range and Initial Balance (TradingView) · TE Previous Session Structure (TradingView) · Market hours

See alsoETH (extended trading hours) · Opening range (OR)

Opening range (OR)

Also written: OR

What it reads
The high and low traded in the first minutes of a session, 30 by default.
How it is computed
OR high = max(high), OR low = min(low) over bars with open ≤ t < open + 30 minutes, counted in time, not bars.
Why that information matters
Its edges are the first reference the rest of the session is measured against, and its width says what kind of open it was.
What it does not tell you
It records the first 30 minutes only. It does not say which edge, if either, price will close through.
Worked example

First 30 minutes of an ES regular session: high 5,021.25, low 5,008.75.

→ OR = 5,008.75 to 5,021.25, 12.50 points wide.

Used byTE Session Boundaries, Opening Range and Initial Balance (TradingView) · APOLLO ONE

See alsoInitial balance (IB) · FORMING · SET

Initial balance (IB)

Also written: IB

What it reads
The high and low of a session’s first hour, the market-profile convention.
How it is computed
IB high = max(high), IB low = min(low) over open ≤ t < open + 60 minutes: the first two 30-minute periods.
Why that information matters
It is the wider, slower reference beside the opening range. A day that stays inside it and one that leaves it differ.
What it does not tell you
It measures the first hour. It is not a stop distance and not a target.
Worked example

First hour of an NQ regular session: high 18,240.50, low 18,166.00.

→ IB = 18,166.00 to 18,240.50, 74.50 points wide.

Used byTE Session Boundaries, Opening Range and Initial Balance (TradingView) · APOLLO ONE

See alsoOpening range (OR) · RTH (regular trading hours)

Prior-session levels

Also written: PDH · PDL · PDC · prior day high · prior day low · overnight high · overnight low · previous week high · previous week low

What it reads
Highs, lows and closes of finished periods: the previous day, the overnight stretch, the previous week.
How it is computed
Each period is closed and published before the current bar counts into the next, so none holds a bar it precedes.
Why that information matters
Everyone can see them, and knowing which period a line came from tells you the scale to read it at.
What it does not tell you
A past price carries no claim that price reacts there, and nothing here ranks one level over another.
Worked example

Previous day high 5,040.00, low 4,988.50, close 5,012.25. Last price 5,019.00.

→ PDH 21.00 points above, PDL 30.50 below, PDC 6.75 below.

Used byTE Previous Session Structure (TradingView)

See alsoSET · BROKEN BELOW · RECLAIMED

Reclaim

What it reads
Price returning to the side of a level it was on before it broke through.
How it is computed
A confirmed close back on the original side after at least one close beyond the level. A wick back is a touch only.
Why that information matters
It separates a level price has left behind from one it has fought back to, which decides whether the level is still in play.
What it does not tell you
One close back says nothing about whether the next one holds. Acceptance asks that separate question.
Worked example

Level 5,000.00. One-minute closes: 4,996.50, 4,994.25, then 5,001.75.

→ The third close, 5,001.75, is the reclaim. The first two were closes below.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoAcceptance · RECLAIMED · Flush

Acceptance

Also written: hold · minimum hold

What it reads
Whether price has stayed on the reclaimed side of a level long enough to count as holding it.
How it is computed
A required run of confirmed closes at or above the level: 3 one-minute closes in APOLLO ONE by default, more after a deeper flush.
Why that information matters
A reclaim is not acceptance: the hold separates a level that held from one that was only touched.
What it does not tell you
A held level can still fail on the next bar. Acceptance is a condition, not an outcome.
Worked example

Level 5,000.00, required hold 3 minutes. Closes after the reclaim 5,001.50, 5,002.25, 5,000.75.

→ Three closes at or above 5,000.00: the hold reads 3 of 3.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoReclaim · % READY

OPEN ABOVE RANGE

What it reads
The session opened above the whole of the prior session’s traded range.
How it is computed
open > prior session high, checked once on the session’s first bar.
Why that information matters
The open is trading at prices the prior session never reached, so none of its structure sits overhead.
What it does not tell you
It describes where the open printed. It does not say whether price returns into the prior range.
Worked example

Prior session high 5,040.00, value area high 5,028.00. Open 5,046.50.

→ 5,046.50 > 5,040.00: OPEN ABOVE RANGE, 6.50 points above.

See alsoOPEN ABOVE VALUE · Value area (VAH, VAL) · Prior-session levels

OPEN ABOVE VALUE

What it reads
The session opened above the prior value area but still inside the prior session’s range.
How it is computed
prior VAH < open ≤ prior session high.
Why that information matters
The open sits above where most of the prior session’s volume traded, on prices that session did reach.
What it does not tell you
It is a location at one instant and carries no claim about the direction of the session.
Worked example

Prior high 5,040.00, prior VAH 5,028.00. Open 5,033.25.

→ 5,028.00 < 5,033.25 ≤ 5,040.00: OPEN ABOVE VALUE.

See alsoOPEN INSIDE VALUE · ABOVE VALUE

OPEN INSIDE VALUE

What it reads
The session opened inside the prior session’s value area.
How it is computed
prior VAL ≤ open ≤ prior VAH. An open exactly on an edge counts as inside.
Why that information matters
The day starts where the prior session did most of its trading, a different starting point from an open outside it.
What it does not tell you
It says where the first price printed, nothing about how far the session will travel.
Worked example

Prior VAL 5,004.00, prior VAH 5,028.00. Open 5,015.50.

→ 5,015.50 lies between the edges: OPEN INSIDE VALUE.

See alsoINSIDE VALUE · Value area (VAH, VAL)

OPEN BELOW VALUE

What it reads
The session opened below the prior value area but still inside the prior session’s range.
How it is computed
prior session low ≤ open < prior VAL.
Why that information matters
The open is under where most of the prior session’s volume traded, on prices that session did reach.
What it does not tell you
It describes the open. It does not say the session will move up or down from there.
Worked example

Prior low 4,988.50, prior VAL 5,004.00. Open 4,997.75.

→ 4,988.50 ≤ 4,997.75 < 5,004.00: OPEN BELOW VALUE.

See alsoOPEN BELOW RANGE · BELOW VALUE

OPEN BELOW RANGE

What it reads
The session opened below the whole of the prior session’s range.
How it is computed
open < prior session low, checked on the session’s first bar.
Why that information matters
The open is at prices the prior session never traded, so none of its structure sits underneath.
What it does not tell you
An open below the range is a location, not a forecast of follow-through or of a return.
Worked example

Prior session low 4,988.50. Open 4,979.00.

→ 4,979.00 < 4,988.50: OPEN BELOW RANGE, 9.50 points below.

See alsoOPEN BELOW VALUE · Prior-session levels

ABOVE VALUE

What it reads
The last close sits above the prior session’s value area high.
How it is computed
close > prior VAH, re-checked on every closed bar. A close on the edge counts as inside.
Why that information matters
Price is trading above where the prior session did most of its business, now rather than at the open.
What it does not tell you
It is reported, not interpreted: being above value does not mean price stays there.
Worked example

Prior VAH 5,028.00. Last close 5,031.25.

→ ABOVE VALUE, 3.25 points over the edge.

See alsoINSIDE VALUE · Value area (VAH, VAL)

INSIDE VALUE

What it reads
The last close sits within the prior session’s value area, edges included.
How it is computed
prior VAL ≤ close ≤ prior VAH on the latest closed bar.
Why that information matters
Price is back where most of the prior session’s volume traded, the band both edges are measured from.
What it does not tell you
Inside value is a position with no lifecycle. It says nothing about which edge comes next.
Worked example

Prior VAL 5,004.00, prior VAH 5,028.00. Last close 5,028.00.

→ The close equals the 5,028.00 edge, which counts as inside: INSIDE VALUE.

See alsoABOVE VALUE · BELOW VALUE

BELOW VALUE

What it reads
The last close sits below the prior session’s value area low.
How it is computed
close < prior VAL on the latest closed bar.
Why that information matters
Price is trading under the zone where most of the prior session’s volume changed hands.
What it does not tell you
It is a location now, not a statement that price keeps falling or comes back.
Worked example

Prior VAL 5,004.00. Last close 4,999.50.

→ BELOW VALUE, 4.50 points under the edge.

See alsoINSIDE VALUE · Value area (VAH, VAL)

FORMING

What it reads
A range or level is still being built: its window has not closed yet.
How it is computed
Printed while open ≤ t < open + window. The high and low can still move until the window ends.
Why that information matters
A forming edge can still move, so reading it as a finished level is reading a number that may change in a minute.
What it does not tell you
It says the window is open. It says nothing about how wide the range will end.
Worked example

Opening range window 30 minutes, session open 09:30 ET, time now 09:52 ET.

→ FORMING: 22 of 30 minutes gone, 8 to go.

Used byTE Session Boundaries, Opening Range and Initial Balance (TradingView)

See alsoSET · Opening range (OR)

SET

What it reads
The level is finished and no confirmed bar has closed beyond it since.
How it is computed
Published when its window or period closes. It stays SET until a close on the far side, a wick alone counting as a touch.
Why that information matters
A finished level nobody has closed through is a different object from one price already has.
What it does not tell you
SET is a history of closes, not a rating. It does not say the level will hold.
Worked example

Opening range set at 10:00 ET as 5,008.75 to 5,021.25. Every close since lies between them.

→ Both edges, 5,008.75 and 5,021.25, read SET.

Used byTE Session Boundaries, Opening Range and Initial Balance (TradingView) · TE Previous Session Structure (TradingView)

See alsoBROKEN ABOVE · BROKEN BELOW · TESTED

BROKEN ABOVE

What it reads
A confirmed bar has closed above a level that price sat below when the level was set.
How it is computed
close > level for a level set with price below it. A high above it without the close is a touch only.
Why that information matters
It marks the level as behind price, which changes whether you read it as overhead or as structure below.
What it does not tell you
A close through is an event that already happened, not a signal and not a reason to act.
Worked example

Opening range high 5,021.25. Closes 5,019.50, then 5,023.00.

→ The 5,023.00 close prints BROKEN ABOVE.

Used byTE Session Boundaries, Opening Range and Initial Balance (TradingView) · TE Previous Session Structure (TradingView)

See alsoRECLAIMED · FLIPPED

BROKEN BELOW

What it reads
A confirmed bar has closed below a level that price sat above when the level was set.
How it is computed
close < level for a level set with price above it. Only the close counts, never the low alone.
Why that information matters
It records the level as lost on a closing basis, a different situation from a wick through it.
What it does not tell you
It says what one close did. It does not say the move continues or that the level is finished.
Worked example

Prior day low 4,988.50. A bar trades down to 4,985.00 and closes 4,987.25.

→ Close below 4,988.50: BROKEN BELOW (the 4,985.00 low alone would be a touch).

Used byTE Session Boundaries, Opening Range and Initial Balance (TradingView) · TE Previous Session Structure (TradingView)

See alsoRECLAIMED · FLIPPED

RECLAIMED

What it reads
After a break, a confirmed bar has closed back on the side the level was set from.
How it is computed
A level that was BROKEN, then a close back on its original side. The state changes on the close, never the wick.
Why that information matters
A level that broke and came back has been fought over, which differs from one price has left behind.
What it does not tell you
Reclaimed is a record of two closes. It says nothing about whether the level holds from here.
Worked example

Prior day low 4,988.50 broken below at 4,987.25. A later close 4,990.75.

→ RECLAIMED, back above 4,988.50 by 2.25 points.

Used byTE Session Boundaries, Opening Range and Initial Balance (TradingView) · TE Previous Session Structure (TradingView)

See alsoReclaim · FLIPPED

BALANCED

What it reads
A live range whose edges are intact and whose volatility has not contracted much since it formed.
How it is computed
Born when 20 closed bars fit inside 2.0 × ATR. BALANCED while no close is outside and ATR now ÷ ATR at birth is over 0.75.
Why that information matters
It separates a range that is merely holding from one that is also tightening, which reads COMPRESSED instead.
What it does not tell you
It describes containment so far, not which edge, if either, price closes through.
Worked example

Range 4,990.00 to 5,010.00 born with ATR 12.0. Now ATR 10.2, last close 5,003.50.

→ 10.2 ÷ 12.0 = 0.85 > 0.75, no close outside: BALANCED.

See alsoCOMPRESSED · RETESTED · ATR (average true range)

RETESTED

What it reads
After a range broke, price has come back to the edge it broke through.
How it is computed
Within 20 bars of the break a bar’s wick reaches the broken edge. A visit is enough, no close is needed.
Why that information matters
A break that price returns to check is a different situation from one it leaves without looking back.
What it does not tell you
It records the visit. It does not say whether the edge holds from the new side.
Worked example

Range top 5,010.00 broken by a 5,014.50 close. Six bars later a low of 5,009.75.

→ The wick reaches 5,010.00 inside 20 bars: RETESTED.

See alsoBALANCED · BROKEN ABOVE

TESTED

What it reads
Price has come back to a level and touched it without closing through it.
How it is computed
A visit is a bar whose high-low range reaches the level. Each unbroken run of visiting bars counts as one test.
Why that information matters
A level price has returned to and left intact is a different object from one nobody has touched.
What it does not tell you
A touch count is a history, not a rating: it does not say whether the level is more or less likely to hold.
Worked example

Level 5,000.00, price above. Three bars in a row with lows 4,999.75, 5,000.00, 4,998.50 close above it.

→ One run of visits: 1 test, state TESTED.

See alsoSET · FLIPPED

FLIPPED

What it reads
A level price closed through, revisited from the far side and not closed back through.
How it is computed
A BROKEN level that a later bar reaches again and closes on the new side: old support holding as resistance, or the reverse.
Why that information matters
It is the opposite resolution of RECLAIMED: the break held when price came back to check it.
What it does not tell you
FLIPPED records one revisit. It is not a forecast that the level keeps holding on the next.
Worked example

Support 5,000.00 broken with a 4,996.00 close. A later bar trades up to 5,000.50 and closes 4,997.25.

→ Revisited at 5,000.50, closed back under: FLIPPED.

See alsoRECLAIMED · TESTED

FILLED

Also written: gap fill

What it reads
Price has reached the far edge of a gap: the prior close the market opened away from.
How it is computed
Under the touch convention a wick reaching the prior close fills the gap. Under the close convention a close beyond it is needed.
Why that information matters
A filled gap and an open one are different references, and the stored convention says which definition was used.
What it does not tell you
It reports a fill that happened. Nothing here says whether an open gap will fill, or when.
Worked example

Prior close 5,012.25. The session opens 5,026.00, a 13.75-point gap up. A later bar trades 5,012.00.

→ Touch convention: FILLED at 5,012.00.

See alsoPrior-session levels · TESTED

Volatility

How far bars travel, ranked against the market’s own history.

True range (TR)

Also written: TR · true range

What it reads
How far one bar travelled, counting any gap from the previous close.
How it is computed
TR = max(high − low, |high − previous close|, |low − previous close|).
Why that information matters
A bar that gaps and then sits still has moved, and plain high minus low would miss that move.
What it does not tell you
It is one bar’s range. It carries no direction and says nothing about the bar after it.
Worked example

Previous close 5,000.00. Bar high 5,012.00, low 5,006.00.

→ max(6.00, 12.00, 6.00) = 12.00 points, where high minus low alone says 6.00.

Used byTE ATR Regime (TradingView)

See alsoATR (average true range)

ATR (average true range)

Also written: ATR · average true range · typical bar range

What it reads
How far a typical recent bar travels, in the instrument’s own price units.
How it is computed
Wilder smoothing of true range: ATR = previous ATR + (TR − previous ATR) ÷ 14, the same series as TradingView’s ta.atr.
Why that information matters
It is the unit to read a distance in: 10 points is wide where bars cover 4 and narrow where they cover 20.
What it does not tell you
It measures range already traded. It says nothing about direction or the size of the next bar.
Worked example

Previous ATR 8.00, today’s true range 15.00, length 14.

→ 8.00 + (15.00 − 8.00) ÷ 14 = 8.50 points.

Used byTE ATR Regime (TradingView) · APOLLO ONE

See alsoTrue range (TR) · Time-of-day percentile

Time-of-day percentile

Also written: conditional percentile · percentile at this time of day

What it reads
Where the current reading sits among readings taken at the same clock time on earlier sessions.
How it is computed
The day is cut into one-bar slots on the exchange clock. It keeps this slot’s last 20 values, and p = share at or below now.
Why that information matters
It separates a big move from a busy hour: the open is wide every day, which a plain percentile cannot see.
What it does not tell you
It ranks, it does not forecast. A slot needs 10 sessions on file before it ranks anything.
Worked example

The 10:00 slot’s last 20 ATR readings. Today’s 9.4 is at or above 17 of them.

→ p = 17 ÷ 20 = 0.85: the 85th percentile for this time of day.

Used byTE ATR Regime (TradingView) · TE Relative Volume at Time (TradingView)

See alsoTrailing percentile · ATR (average true range) · Relative volume at time (RVOL)

Trailing percentile

Also written: unconditional percentile · plain percentile

What it reads
Where the current reading sits among the most recent readings, ignoring the time of day.
How it is computed
The last 480 closed bars are ranked and p = share at or below the current value. It needs 120 bars before it ranks.
Why that information matters
Shown beside the time-of-day rank, it shows how much of a high reading is only the hour of the day.
What it does not tell you
Every hour is pooled, so a quiet slot and the open are judged against the same mixed history.
Worked example

480 bars on file. The current ATR is at or above 312 of them.

→ p = 312 ÷ 480 = 0.65: the 65th percentile overall.

Used byTE ATR Regime (TradingView) · TE Relative Volume at Time (TradingView)

See alsoTime-of-day percentile

COMPRESSED

What it reads
The reading is in the lowest fifth of its own history: unusually narrow bars or light volume.
How it is computed
Percentile p from 0 to 0.20. Leaving a band takes 0.05 of margin and 2 closed bars, so the word does not flicker.
Why that information matters
The same distance is a big move in COMPRESSED and an ordinary one in EXPANDED, so the band sets the scale.
What it does not tell you
It is not a squeeze signal: a narrow market is not said to be about to widen or to move either way.
Worked example

Time-of-day percentile p = 0.12.

→ 0.12 lies in 0 to 0.20: COMPRESSED.

Used byTE ATR Regime (TradingView) · TE Relative Volume at Time (TradingView)

See alsoSUBDUED · EXPANDING · Time-of-day percentile

SUBDUED

What it reads
The reading is in the second-lowest fifth: quieter than usual for this market at this time, not extreme.
How it is computed
Percentile p from 0.20 to 0.40. Moving up from COMPRESSED needs p above 0.25 for 2 closed bars.
Why that information matters
It says conditions are below their norm without being at the edge, a different context from either extreme.
What it does not tell you
A quieter-than-usual reading says nothing about what the next bars will do, or which way.
Worked example

Band COMPRESSED. Then p moves from 0.18 to 0.23.

→ Still COMPRESSED: 0.23 is not above 0.25, the edge plus the margin.

Used byTE ATR Regime (TradingView) · TE Relative Volume at Time (TradingView)

See alsoCOMPRESSED · BASELINE

BASELINE

What it reads
The reading is in the middle fifth of its own history: an ordinary level for this market and time of day.
How it is computed
Percentile p from 0.40 to 0.60 of the ranked history, published once the margin and the 2-bar hold are met.
Why that information matters
It is the reference condition the other four bands are read against: neither stretched nor quiet.
What it does not tell you
Ordinary for the past is not a promise of ordinary next. The band describes bars already closed.
Worked example

20 readings at this slot. Today’s is at or above 9 of them.

→ p = 9 ÷ 20 = 0.45: BASELINE.

Used byTE ATR Regime (TradingView) · TE Relative Volume at Time (TradingView)

See alsoSUBDUED · ELEVATED

ELEVATED

What it reads
The reading is in the second-highest fifth: wider or busier than usual for this market at this time.
How it is computed
Percentile p from 0.60 to 0.80. Moving up from BASELINE needs p above 0.65 for 2 closed bars.
Why that information matters
A distance that takes an hour in BASELINE can go in a few bars here, which changes the room a level or stop has.
What it does not tell you
Busier than usual describes recent bars. It does not say the activity continues, or which way price goes.
Worked example

Band BASELINE. Then p reads 0.68 on two closed bars in a row.

→ 0.68 > 0.65 twice: ELEVATED.

Used byTE ATR Regime (TradingView) · TE Relative Volume at Time (TradingView)

See alsoBASELINE · EXPANDED

EXPANDED

What it reads
The reading is in the top fifth of its own history: unusually wide bars, or unusually heavy volume.
How it is computed
Percentile p from 0.80 to 1.00 of the ranked history, after the same margin and 2-bar hold.
Why that information matters
Bars this wide make fixed point distances small in relative terms, so reading distance in ATR matters most here.
What it does not tell you
EXPANDED says recent bars were wide for this hour. It does not say they stay wide or that price will trend.
Worked example

20 readings at this slot. Today’s is at or above 18 of them.

→ p = 18 ÷ 20 = 0.90: EXPANDED.

Used byTE ATR Regime (TradingView) · TE Relative Volume at Time (TradingView)

See alsoELEVATED · CONTRACTING

EXPANDING

What it reads
The ATR is rising: recent bars are wider than they were a few bars ago.
How it is computed
r = (ATR now − ATR 5 bars ago) ÷ ATR 5 bars ago. EXPANDING when r is above +5%.
Why that information matters
A market can sit in COMPRESSED and be EXPANDING: ranges starting to widen before the band itself moves.
What it does not tell you
A rising ATR describes width, never direction, and does not say how long the widening lasts.
Worked example

ATR now 7.70. ATR 5 bars ago 7.00.

→ r = 0.70 ÷ 7.00 = +10%: EXPANDING.

Used byTE ATR Regime (TradingView)

See alsoSTABLE · CONTRACTING · ATR (average true range)

STABLE

What it reads
The ATR has barely changed over the last few bars.
How it is computed
The same r between −5% and +5%. The deadband stops tiny changes from flipping the word on every bar.
Why that information matters
It says the width of the bars is not moving either way, so the band beside it is not about to be overtaken.
What it does not tell you
Stable width says nothing about price direction. A stable market can still travel a long way.
Worked example

ATR now 7.21. ATR 5 bars ago 7.00.

→ r = +3%, inside ±5%: STABLE.

Used byTE ATR Regime (TradingView)

See alsoEXPANDING · CONTRACTING

CONTRACTING

What it reads
The ATR is falling: recent bars are narrower than they were a few bars ago.
How it is computed
The same r below −5% reads CONTRACTING.
Why that information matters
It shows conditions quieting before the band catches up, since the percentile only moves after its margin and hold.
What it does not tell you
Narrowing bars are not a forecast of a breakout, or of continued quiet.
Worked example

ATR now 6.30. ATR 5 bars ago 7.00.

→ r = −0.70 ÷ 7.00 = −10%: CONTRACTING.

Used byTE ATR Regime (TradingView)

See alsoEXPANDING · STABLE

Median 30-minute range

Also written: 30-minute range

What it reads
The typical distance from high to low inside one 30-minute window of the day, in points.
How it is computed
Per session, the window’s high minus its low from one-minute bars. The median across sessions is reported.
Why that information matters
It shows when in the day a market usually covers ground, which sets the scale for distances read at that hour.
What it does not tell you
A median describes ordinary days. Event days sit in the tail it leaves out, and range is not direction.
Worked example

One slot over five sessions: 18.25, 9.50, 12.00, 30.75 and 11.25 points.

→ Sorted, the middle value is 12.00 points. The 30.75 day does not move it.

Used byBest time to trade ES and NQ

See alsoVolume share · ATR (average true range)

Volume and value

How much traded, when, and at which prices.

Relative volume at time (RVOL)

Also written: RVOL · relative volume

What it reads
How much this bar traded compared with what the same time of day usually trades.
How it is computed
RVOL = this bar’s volume ÷ the median volume of the last 20 bars in the same time-of-day slot.
Why that information matters
The open and lunch trade on different scales. Comparing a bar with its own slot is what makes heavy mean something.
What it does not tell you
It says how busy, not who bought or sold, and a symbol that reports no volume gets no number at all.
Worked example

This 10:30 bar traded 42,000. The slot’s median over 20 sessions is 28,000.

→ RVOL = 42,000 ÷ 28,000 = 1.5×.

Used byTE Relative Volume at Time (TradingView)

See alsoSession pace · Time-of-day percentile

Session pace

Also written: cumulative volume pace

What it reads
How much the market has traded so far today compared with the same point in earlier sessions.
How it is computed
Volume summed from the session start to the last closed bar, ranked against the running total at this slot in the last 20 sessions.
Why that information matters
It says whether the day as a whole is busy or thin, which a single bar’s volume cannot.
What it does not tell you
A running total carries no direction, and an early-close session simply reads light.
Worked example

By 11:00 ET today, 610,000 contracts. At 11:00 in the last 20 sessions, 14 totals were at or below that.

→ Pace at the 70th percentile (14 ÷ 20).

Used byTE Relative Volume at Time (TradingView) · APOLLO ONE

See alsoRelative volume at time (RVOL) · Volume share

Volume share

What it reads
The fraction of a whole session’s volume that traded inside one window of the day.
How it is computed
Window volume ÷ the session’s total volume, per session. The median fraction across sessions is reported.
Why that information matters
It shows when participation concentrates, so a level reached in a busy window and one reached in a thin one read differently.
What it does not tell you
A share of volume is not direction, and a median says little about an unusual day.
Worked example

A session trades 1,600,000 contracts, 192,000 of them from 09:30 to 10:00 ET.

→ 192,000 ÷ 1,600,000 = 12.0% of the day in that half hour.

Used byBest time to trade ES and NQ

See alsoMedian 30-minute range · Session pace

Volume profile

Also written: volume at price

What it reads
How much volume traded at each price over a period, drawn as a sideways histogram.
How it is computed
Rebuilt from candles here: each one-minute bar’s volume is spread evenly over the price rows its range covers.
Why that information matters
It shows where a session did its business and where it passed through quickly, which a time chart hides.
What it does not tell you
A candle rebuild is not trade-by-trade volume at each price, and it carries no split between buyers and sellers.
Worked example

A one-minute bar trades 400 contracts from 5,000.00 to 5,001.00 on 0.25-point rows.

→ Five price rows touched: 80 contracts each under an even spread.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoPoint of control (POC) · Value area (VAH, VAL)

Point of control (POC)

Also written: POC

What it reads
The single price row where the most volume traded in a session.
How it is computed
The row holding the largest volume in the profile, read once the session has closed for a prior-session profile.
Why that information matters
It is where the session agreed on price most, the reference the value area is built outward from.
What it does not tell you
Heavy volume at a price is a record, not a magnet: it carries no claim that price returns there.
Worked example

Rows 4,998.00: 9,200. 5,004.50: 14,800. 5,010.00: 11,300 (the three largest).

→ POC = 5,004.50.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoValue area (VAH, VAL) · Volume profile

Value area (VAH, VAL)

Also written: VAH · VAL · value area high · value area low

What it reads
The price band around the POC that holds 70% of a session’s volume. Its top is VAH and its bottom VAL.
How it is computed
Start at the POC and extend toward the heavier neighbouring rows, one step at a time, until the band holds 70% of the total.
Why that information matters
Its edges are where the prior session’s accepted prices end, so opens and closes are described against them.
What it does not tell you
The 70% is a convention: a different percentage or row height moves both edges.
Worked example

Session total 1,000,000 contracts. The walk from the POC reaches 700,000 at 4,992.00 to 5,016.00.

→ VAL 4,992.00, VAH 5,016.00: a band 24.00 points wide.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoPoint of control (POC) · OPEN INSIDE VALUE · ABOVE VALUE

VWAP (volume-weighted average price)

Also written: VWAP · anchored VWAP · session VWAP

What it reads
The average price traded since an anchor, weighted by how much volume traded at each price.
How it is computed
VWAP = Σ(price × volume) ÷ Σ(volume) from the anchor, often the session open. Charts usually price a bar at (high + low + close) ÷ 3.
Why that information matters
It is the average price paid since the anchor, a reference both sides of the market can see.
What it does not tell you
It depends on the anchor and it lags: it describes trade already done, not where price goes.
Worked example

Two bars since the open: 1,000 contracts at 5,000.00, then 3,000 at 5,008.00.

→ (5,000,000 + 15,024,000) ÷ 4,000 = 5,006.00.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoVolume profile · Point of control (POC)

Risk and size

The arithmetic between a stop, a budget and a contract count.

Tick (minimum price increment)

Also written: tick · tick size · minimum tick

What it reads
The smallest step a price can move on an instrument.
How it is computed
Set by the exchange and read from the symbol: 0.25 index points on ES and NQ, 0.10 on gold (GC), 0.01 on crude (CL).
Why that information matters
Orders sit on ticks, so stops, entries and sizes are rounded to it. A distance is a whole number of ticks.
What it does not tell you
The tick size says nothing about what one tick is worth. That is the tick value.
Worked example

A 3.00-point stop on ES, tick 0.25.

→ 3.00 ÷ 0.25 = 12 ticks.

Used byFutures contract reference · Position size calculator · TE Position Size and Risk (TradingView)

See alsoTick value · Point value (multiplier)

Tick value

Also written: dollars per tick

What it reads
The money one tick of movement is worth on one contract.
How it is computed
tick value = tick size × point value: on ES 0.25 × $50 = $12.50, on MES 0.25 × $5 = $1.25.
Why that information matters
It turns a distance in ticks into money, the form a risk budget is written in.
What it does not tell you
It is per contract and before costs. Commission and slippage come on top.
Worked example

NQ: tick 0.25, point value $20. A 40-tick stop.

→ $5.00 per tick. 40 × $5.00 = $200.00 per contract.

Used byFutures contract reference · Position size calculator

See alsoTick (minimum price increment) · Point value (multiplier) · Round-turn cost

Point value (multiplier)

Also written: contract multiplier · per-point value · dollars per point · multiplier

What it reads
The money a 1.00 move in price is worth on one unit: one contract, one share or one coin.
How it is computed
Read from the symbol or the exchange specification: $50 on ES, $5 on MES, $20 on NQ, $100 on GC, $1 on a share.
Why that information matters
The same stop in points costs ten times more on ES than on MES, so the multiplier decides the size, not the chart.
What it does not tell you
Exchanges can change contract terms. Check your broker’s specification before sizing real money.
Worked example

A 12.00-point stop.

→ ES: 12 × $50 = $600 per contract. MES: 12 × $5 = $60.

Used byFutures contract reference · Position size calculator · TE Position Size and Risk (TradingView)

See alsoTick value · Micro contract

Stop distance

Also written: stop · stop-loss distance

What it reads
How far the stop sits from the entry, in points, ticks and percent of price.
How it is computed
d = |entry − stop|. In ticks, d ÷ tick size. In percent, 100 × d ÷ entry.
Why that information matters
It is the one price input a position size depends on: the entry level alone changes nothing about how many units fit.
What it does not tell you
It is the planned loss per unit. A stop can gap or slip past its price, so a realised loss can be larger.
Worked example

Entry 5,000.00, stop 4,990.00, ES tick 0.25.

→ d = 10.00 points = 40 ticks = 0.20% of the entry.

Used byTE Position Size and Risk (TradingView) · Position size calculator

See alsoPosition size · R (one unit of risk)

Risk budget

Also written: risk per trade

What it reads
The most money you decide to lose on one trade if the stop is hit, costs included.
How it is computed
Typed as a fixed amount, or as a percent of account: budget = account × percent ÷ 100.
Why that information matters
It is the number a position size is divided out of, so it fixes how many units any stop distance allows.
What it does not tell you
It is your rule, not a measurement of the trade. Nothing here says what the right budget is for you.
Worked example

Account $25,000, risk 1% per trade.

→ Budget = 25,000 × 1 ÷ 100 = $250 per trade.

Used byTE Position Size and Risk (TradingView) · Position size calculator

See alsoPosition size · Daily loss limit

R (one unit of risk)

Also written: R · 1R

What it reads
The planned loss on a trade, used as the unit every other distance and result is counted in.
How it is computed
1R = |entry − stop| × point value × units + costs. A favourable move of twice the stop distance is +2R.
Why that information matters
Counting in R makes trades of different sizes and markets comparable, and turns a daily limit into a count.
What it does not tell you
R is a unit, not a result: a target 3R away says nothing about whether it is reached.
Worked example

Entry 5,000.00, stop 4,992.00 (8 points), 2 MES at $5 a point, no costs.

→ 1R = 8 × 5 × 2 = $80. A target 24 points away is 3R.

Used byAPOLLO ONE · TE Position Size and Risk (TradingView)

See alsoReward-to-risk (R:R) · Stop distance

Reward-to-risk (R:R)

Also written: R:R · reward multiple · R-multiple · reward-to-risk ratio

What it reads
How far the target sits from the entry, in multiples of the stop distance.
How it is computed
Gross R:R = |target − entry| ÷ |entry − stop|. Net R:R also charges round-turn costs on the way in and out.
Why that information matters
It sets the break-even win rate a plan needs, so it is half the arithmetic of any trade plan.
What it does not tell you
A further target is also reached less often, so R:R and the chance of reaching it are not independent choices.
Worked example

Entry 5,000.00, stop 4,990.00, target 5,025.00.

→ 25 ÷ 10 = 2.5 : 1 before costs.

Used byTE Position Size and Risk (TradingView) · Break-even win rate table

See alsoBreak-even win rate · R (one unit of risk)

Break-even win rate

What it reads
The share of trades a plan must win just to come out flat at a given reward-to-risk, before costs.
How it is computed
p = 1 ÷ (1 + R), where R is the average win divided by the average loss.
Why that information matters
It turns a reward-to-risk into the bar a method would have to clear: arithmetic, not a claim about any method.
What it does not tell you
It does not say whether any method reaches that share, and costs raise every number it gives.
Worked example

R = 2: win $2 for each $1 lost.

→ 1 ÷ (1 + 2) = 33.3%: one win in three is flat.

Used byBreak-even win rate table

See alsoReward-to-risk (R:R)

Position size

Also written: contract count · quantity

What it reads
How many contracts, shares or coins a risk budget allows for a given stop.
How it is computed
size = floor(budget ÷ (stop distance × point value + costs per unit)), rounded down to the instrument’s step.
Why that information matters
Rounding down keeps the planned risk at or under the budget. Rounding up would go over the number you set.
What it does not tell you
It sizes a plan. It does not say whether the stop is well placed or the trade worth taking.
Worked example

$200 budget. MES stop 10.00 points at $5 a point. $1.50 costs per contract.

→ 200 ÷ 51.50 = 3.88, rounded down to 3 contracts: $154.50 at risk.

Used byTE Position Size and Risk (TradingView) · Position size calculator

See alsoRisk budget · Stop distance · Round-turn cost

Round-turn cost

Also written: round turn · commission · slippage · costs per round turn

What it reads
What one unit costs to get in and out of beyond the price move: commission, fees and slippage.
How it is computed
Commission and fees on the entry and the exit, plus slippage: the gap between the planned price and the filled one.
Why that information matters
A stopped trade loses its costs too, so a size that ignores them is over budget before the trade starts.
What it does not tell you
Slippage is an estimate you type. Fast markets and gaps can make the real figure larger.
Worked example

MES: $0.62 commission each way plus a $0.25 slippage allowance.

→ 0.62 × 2 + 0.25 = $1.49 per contract, round turn.

Used byPosition size calculator · TE Position Size and Risk (TradingView)

See alsoPosition size · Tick value

Daily loss limit

Also written: daily limit · max daily loss

What it reads
The most you allow yourself to lose in one trading day before you stop taking new trades.
How it is computed
Losses are summed from the day’s start. At the limit, no new size. APOLLO ONE counts it in R and its card reads STAND DOWN.
Why that information matters
It caps the one day that can undo a week, and decides how many full-size attempts a day can hold.
What it does not tell you
It is a rule you set, not a forecast. A gap through a stop can still carry a day past it.
Worked example

Limit 2.5R with 1R = $200. Two stops today (−2R).

→ $100 of room left: a third full 1R trade would breach it.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoSTAND DOWN · R (one unit of risk) · Drawdown

Drawdown

Also written: max drawdown · maximum drawdown

What it reads
How far an account has fallen from its highest balance, in money or percent.
How it is computed
drawdown = peak balance − current balance. Maximum drawdown is the largest such fall over the period.
Why that information matters
It measures the stretch a trader has to sit through, which a final balance alone hides.
What it does not tell you
A past drawdown describes one path. It is not the most an account can fall in future.
Worked example

Balance runs 50,000, then 52,400, then 50,900.

→ Drawdown = 52,400 − 50,900 = $1,500, 2.9% of the peak.

See alsoTrailing drawdown · Daily loss limit

Trailing drawdown

Also written: trailing max drawdown · trailing threshold

What it reads
A loss limit that moves up as the balance makes new highs, so the floor follows the peak.
How it is computed
floor = highest balance reached − allowance. Some rules trail closed balance, some intraday, many stop trailing at a set level.
Why that information matters
A gain lifts the floor too, so the room left can be under the starting allowance even after gains.
What it does not tell you
Rules differ by firm and change often. This is the general mechanism, not any firm’s current rule.
Worked example

Allowance $2,000 from a $50,000 start (floor 48,000). The balance peaks at 51,200.

→ Floor rises to 49,200. At a 50,300 balance the room left is $1,100.

See alsoDrawdown · Daily loss limit

Contracts and calendars

The futures words our contract pages and the roll calendar print.

Micro contract

Also written: micro · micros · micro futures

What it reads
A smaller version of a futures contract on the same market, usually one tenth of the size.
How it is computed
Same tick in price at a fraction of the point value: MES is $5 a point against $50 on ES. MNQ $2 against $20 on NQ.
Why that information matters
The same stop fits a smaller budget, so a plan that does not fit one full contract can fit a few micros.
What it does not tell you
A micro changes the money at stake, not the market: price moves the same number of points on both.
Worked example

A 20-point stop with a $300 budget, no costs.

→ ES: 20 × $50 = $1,000, does not fit. MES: 20 × $5 = $100, 3 fit.

Used byFutures contract reference · Position size calculator · APOLLO ONE

See alsoPoint value (multiplier) · Position size

Contract month

Also written: month code · contract code

What it reads
Which expiry a futures contract is: the letter code and year inside a symbol such as NQH2027.
How it is computed
Quarterly index futures use H for March, M for June, U for September and Z for December. Other markets list more months.
Why that information matters
Two months of the same market trade at different prices, so a level only means something against the month it came from.
What it does not tell you
The code names the expiry. It does not say which month is the most traded right now.
Worked example

NQH2027.

→ E-mini Nasdaq-100, the March (H) 2027 contract.

Used byFutures roll calendar

See alsoRoll date · Last trade date

Roll date

Also written: roll · rollover · futures roll

What it reads
The day trading customarily moves from the expiring contract month to the next one.
How it is computed
For CME equity index futures, CME’s customary roll date is the Monday before the third Friday of the expiry month.
Why that information matters
Volume moves months around it, so a chart or level built on the old month stops describing the one being traded.
What it does not tell you
It is a convention: you can roll whenever you choose, and other markets follow other rules.
Worked example

ES December 2026: the third Friday is December 18.

→ Customary roll date: Monday, December 14, 2026.

Used byFutures roll calendar

See alsoLast trade date · Continuous contract

Last trade date

Also written: expiration · expiry · last trading day

What it reads
The final day a futures contract month can trade before it expires and settles.
How it is computed
Each exchange rule sets it: for CME equity index futures the third Friday of the contract month, trading ending 09:30 ET.
Why that information matters
A position still open in that month is settled by the exchange, so the date marks when the month stops being tradable.
What it does not tell you
A rule can land on a holiday and be moved, so check the exchange’s own calendar.
Worked example

ES December 2026 contract.

→ Last trade Friday, December 18, 2026, at 09:30 ET.

Used byFutures roll calendar

See alsoRoll date · Contract month

Continuous contract

Also written: continuous chart · front-month chart

What it reads
A chart symbol that strings successive contract months together into one long history.
How it is computed
The platform switches to the next month at a roll. A back-adjusted version also shifts past prices by the gap between months.
Why that information matters
Levels drawn on a continuous chart can sit at prices the contract you trade never printed, especially across a roll.
What it does not tell you
It is a charting construction: no exchange trades a continuous contract.
Worked example

The old month ends at 5,020.00 while the new month trades 5,060.00 at the roll.

→ A back-adjusted chart moves every earlier price up 40.00 points.

Used byFutures roll calendar

See alsoRoll date · Contract month

APOLLO ONE states

The words on APOLLO ONE’s card, from the build on our charts. APOLLO ONE plans ES, NQ, GC and SI, minis or micros, on TradingView.

APPROACHING

What it reads
Price is near a level APOLLO ONE has graded, and no setup is forming there yet.
How it is computed
Printed when the last close sits above an eligible support no more than 1 × the 15-minute ATR away. The card names the level.
Why that information matters
It names the level in play before anything has happened there, so attention goes to it first.
What it does not tell you
It is a distance, not a forecast: being near a level says nothing about whether a setup forms there.
Worked example

Graded support 5,000.00. 15-minute ATR 9.50. Last close 5,007.25.

→ 7.25 ≤ 9.50: APPROACHING, “support 5,000.00 within 1 ATR”.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoFlush · ATR (average true range)

Flush

Also written: PENDING · FLUSH

What it reads
Price has traded through a graded support and below it, with no close back above yet.
How it is computed
Depth = level − the low after the break, measured in ATR. A flush too shallow or too deep does not count.
Why that information matters
It is the first stage the card tracks: until a close returns above the level it reads PENDING · FLUSH, with no READY figure.
What it does not tell you
A flush is an event below a level. It says nothing about whether price comes back above it.
Worked example

Level 5,000.00, ATR 10.00. Low 4,991.50, last close 4,995.00.

→ Depth 8.50 = 0.85 ATR, no close above yet: PENDING · FLUSH.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoReclaim · % READY

% READY

Also written: PENDING · % READY · READY percentage

What it reads
The card’s READY figure: how much of the confirmation checklist is met, not a win probability.
How it is computed
Each condition met adds its share: the reclaim, the required hold, the zone cleared, within reach, a level 3R above, price above the level.
Why that information matters
The card names the condition still missing, so a 72% setup is visibly not a confirmed one.
What it does not tell you
It counts conditions met. It is not a grade or an estimate that the setup will work.
Worked example

Reclaimed. Hold 2 of 3 minutes. Zone not cleared. Within reach. A level 3R above. Price above the level.

→ 4 of 6 conditions met and the hold 2 of 3: PENDING with READY under 100, naming what is still owed.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoAcceptance · PENDING · No level 3R above

CONFIRMED · ARMED

Also written: ARMED

What it reads
Every check has passed and the plan is on the chart: entry, stop, targets and size, waiting for a fill.
How it is computed
Printed once the hold, reach, 3R room and every card block clear. An unfilled plan ends after 750 trading minutes.
Why that information matters
It is the one state with a whole plan on the chart. Every word before it is a setup still being checked.
What it does not tell you
Armed is a plan, not a result: it says nothing about whether the entry fills or what follows.
Worked example

Entry 5,001.00, stop 4,993.00 (8.00 points). Risk 2.5% of $10,000 = $250. MES at $5 a point.

→ 8 × 5 = $40 per micro: 6 MES, $240 at risk.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoTargets (T1, T2, T3) · Position size · ACTIONABLE

No chase

Also written: price ran past reach: no chase · past reach

What it reads
Price has already moved too far from the planned entry for the plan to be taken as drawn.
How it is computed
Refused once price has reached T1, has covered too much of the way to it, or sits over 1.00 × the 15-minute ATR past the entry (your setting).
Why that information matters
The entry is never walked up to catch the move, so the stop and targets stay where structure put them.
What it does not tell you
It refuses this plan at this moment. It says nothing about where price goes next.
Worked example

Entry 5,000.00. 15-minute ATR 9.00. Last price 5,010.50.

→ 10.50 past the entry > 9.00: no chase.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoTargets (T1, T2, T3) · BLOCKED

Not tradable for this account

Also written: not tradable for this account

What it reads
The stop this setup needs costs more than your risk per trade allows, even at one micro contract.
How it is computed
One micro risks the stop distance × the micro’s point value. Above your risk per trade, no size is shown.
Why that information matters
It says so instead of shrinking the stop to make the trade fit, which would move the stop off structure.
What it does not tell you
It is arithmetic on your setting, not a judgement of the setup.
Worked example

GC stop 26.00 points. MGC $10 a point. Risk per trade $200.

→ 1 MGC risks $260 > $200: not tradable for this account.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoMicro contract · Risk budget

15m trend against

Also written: 15m trend against · 15-minute trend against · SuperTrend

What it reads
The 15-minute trend reads down while the setup is for a move up, so the plan is held back.
How it is computed
A 15m SuperTrend: bands at (high + low) ÷ 2 ± 3 × Wilder ATR(10), ratcheted, flipping only on a close through the active band.
Why that information matters
Against the 15-minute trend a setup arms only at a major level, and one grade lower. Elsewhere the card waits.
What it does not tell you
A trend reading describes bars already closed. It does not say the trend continues.
Worked example

A 15m bar with high 5,012.00, low 5,004.00. ATR(10) 6.00.

→ Midpoint 5,008.00 ± 18.00: bands at 4,990.00 and 5,026.00.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoMajor level · ATR (average true range)

Major level

Also written: not at a major level

What it reads
A level with the most structure behind it, by APOLLO ONE’s own definition.
How it is computed
Close to the rolling profile’s POC or a level it scores major, the prior value area, or a 4h, daily or weekly swing, within an allowance scaled to the ATR.
Why that information matters
With Arm at major levels only on (off by default), a plan arms only there. Elsewhere the card says not at a major level.
What it does not tell you
Major describes the structure behind a level, not whether it holds.
Worked example

Arm level 4,996.50. Prior VAL 4,995.00. Allowance 2.00 points.

→ Distance 1.50 ≤ 2.00: at a major level.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoValue area (VAH, VAL) · Point of control (POC) · 15m trend against

Off-peak window

Also written: off-peak window: no new setups · off-peak hours

What it reads
Hours you mark as off-peak, when new setups are held back. 18:00 to 07:00 New York time by default.
How it is computed
A minute is off-peak when its opening time is at or after the start and before the end. A window can span midnight.
Why that information matters
It keeps new plans out of the hours you mark, or limits them to major levels, by your setting.
What it does not tell you
It is a clock rule you set, not a liquidity measurement. Its effect on outcomes has not been measured.
Worked example

Window 18:00 to 07:00 ET. A setup would arm at 02:14 ET.

→ At 02:14 the card reads “off-peak window: no new setups” and draws no plan.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoMajor level · Exchange session

After stop: wait 15m close

Also written: after stop: wait 15m close

What it reads
A plan on this chart has just ended, so no new plan arms until this 15-minute bar closes.
How it is computed
After a plan ends at its stop or its last exit, arming is held to the end of the 15-minute bar containing that exit.
Why that information matters
A fresh plan cannot arm in the same few minutes the last one ended in.
What it does not tell you
It is a waiting rule on this chart, not a limit on your account.
Worked example

A plan stopped at 10:07 ET.

→ No new plan on this chart before 10:15 ET.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoSTOPPED · STAND DOWN

No level 3R above

Also written: no level 3R above · 3R room · room to 3R

What it reads
No graded level sits at least three stop distances above the entry, so the plan has no room.
How it is computed
Risk = entry − stop. The plan needs a graded level at or beyond entry + 3 × risk, and without one it does not arm.
Why that information matters
Targets come from structure, so a setup with no structure far enough above has nothing to plan toward.
What it does not tell you
It reads the levels on the map now. It is not a forecast of how far price can travel.
Worked example

Entry 5,000.00, stop 4,992.00 (1R = 8.00). Levels above at 5,012.00 and 5,019.50.

→ 3R = 5,024.00 and nothing reaches it: “no level 3R above”.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoTargets (T1, T2, T3) · R (one unit of risk)

Quality bar

Also written: below quality bar: watch

What it reads
The setup’s structure score is under the bar this chart’s recent setups have set, so it is shown to watch only.
How it is computed
A structure score from flush depth, a major level, T1 distance and a held reclaim, compared with a bar set by this chart’s own recent setups.
Why that information matters
It trades fewer plans for setups whose structure ranks higher among this chart’s own recent ones.
What it does not tell you
The score ranks structure, not outcome. It is not a probability.
Worked example

This setup scores 3.1. The bar from this chart’s recent setups reads 3.6.

→ 3.1 < 3.6: “below quality bar: watch”.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoFlush · Major level · Targets (T1, T2, T3)

Armed here already

Also written: armed here already: watch

What it reads
A plan has already armed at this level in this session, so the level does not arm a second one.
How it is computed
Each armed level is recorded for the session. A new setup at a recorded level is shown as watch only.
Why that information matters
It keeps one level from producing a string of plans after the first one has played out.
What it does not tell you
It is a once-per-session rule for the level. It says nothing about the level holding this time.
Worked example

Level 5,000.00 armed at 09:48 ET and stopped. Price reclaims 5,000.00 again at 11:20 ET.

→ The card reads “armed here already: watch”. No second plan at 5,000.00 today.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoAfter stop: wait 15m close · CONFIRMED · ARMED

Waiting for price back above

Also written: waiting for price back above

What it reads
The confirmation checks are met, but the last close is not above both the level and the stop.
How it is computed
Holds while the last close is at or below the stop, or under the level. It clears on a close back at or above the level.
Why that information matters
A plan never arms with price already under its own line, so the card waits for price back where the plan starts.
What it does not tell you
It is a waiting condition. It does not say price will come back above the level.
Worked example

Level 5,000.00, stop 4,992.00. Last close 4,998.25.

→ Under 5,000.00: “waiting for price back above 5,000.00”.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoReclaim · Acceptance

Plan words

The shared state words for a setup, its constraints and a live position.

OBSERVING

What it reads
The tool is reading the market and nothing is setting up.
How it is computed
The resting state, printed whenever no setup condition has started, so the absence of a setup is said out loud.
Why that information matters
A quiet card that says OBSERVING differs from a broken one that says nothing: you know the tool is working.
What it does not tell you
Nothing happening now says nothing about what happens next.
Worked example

Nearest graded level 14.25 points away. 15-minute ATR 9.50.

→ 14.25 > 9.50 and no setup started: OBSERVING.

See alsoDEVELOPING

DEVELOPING

What it reads
A setup has started to form, and its first condition is not complete yet.
How it is computed
Entered when a setup’s first condition starts, such as price trading through its level, and left at the next stage or when it lapses.
Why that information matters
It points attention at one place before there is anything to act on.
What it does not tell you
DEVELOPING is not a plan and carries no claim that the setup will complete.
Worked example

Level 5,000.00. Price trades 4,998.75 at 10:02 ET.

→ At 10:02 the first condition starts: DEVELOPING.

See alsoOBSERVING · PENDING

PENDING

What it reads
A setup is waiting on named conditions before it can become a plan.
How it is computed
Every condition of the setup is listed. PENDING holds while at least one is unmet, and the card names the missing one.
Why that information matters
Naming what is missing turns not yet into something you can check for yourself on the chart.
What it does not tell you
Waiting conditions can stay unmet. PENDING does not say they will be met.
Worked example

Six checks, five met. The one-minute hold reads 2 of 3 minutes.

→ PENDING, missing “hold above 5,000.00 (2/3 min)”.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See also% READY · QUALIFIED

QUALIFIED

What it reads
Every condition of the setup itself is met, before the final checks on reach, room and size.
How it is computed
The setup’s own checklist is complete. The plan must still pass the constraints to become ACTIONABLE.
Why that information matters
It separates the pattern being there from the plan being takeable, which are two different questions.
What it does not tell you
A qualified setup can still be blocked by a constraint, and qualifying is not an outcome.
Worked example

Hold 3 of 3 minutes, zone cleared. Price already 0.7 of the way to T1.

→ QUALIFIED, then BLOCKED: 0.7 is over the 0.5 reach limit.

See alsoACTIONABLE · BLOCKED

ACTIONABLE

What it reads
The plan is complete and every constraint passes: entry, stop, targets and size are all defined.
How it is computed
QUALIFIED plus no blocker: within reach, room to target, a size that fits the budget, inside the hours allowed.
Why that information matters
It is the one state where a whole plan exists to be judged. Every other word describes something not ready.
What it does not tell you
It is a definition, not advice: taking it is your call, and it says nothing about the result.
Worked example

Entry 5,001.00, stop 4,993.00, T1 5,017.00. 6 micros fit a $250 budget.

→ Every check passes: ACTIONABLE, with T1 at 2.0R.

See alsoQUALIFIED · CONFIRMED · ARMED

BLOCKED

What it reads
A setup met its own conditions, but a named constraint stops it becoming a plan.
How it is computed
Constraints are checked in a fixed order and the first one that fails is named: reach, room, size, the hours, the trend.
Why that information matters
A block with its reason says exactly what would have to change, instead of a setup silently vanishing.
What it does not tell you
A block is a rule firing, not a judgement that the setup would have failed.
Worked example

Qualified setup. One micro would risk $260 against a $200 budget.

→ $260 > $200: BLOCKED, not tradable for this account.

See alsoNot tradable for this account · No chase · QUALIFIED

STAND DOWN

Also written: STAND DOWN · daily limit (your setting)

What it reads
The day’s loss limit has been reached, so no new size is shown for the rest of the day.
How it is computed
APOLLO ONE adds this chart’s stopped plans today to the losses you enter, in R. At your daily limit the card reads STAND DOWN.
Why that information matters
Your own rule is held for you on the chart, at the moment it is easiest to break.
What it does not tell you
It counts this chart and the losses you type, not your whole account.
Worked example

Daily limit 2.5R. Two stopped plans (2R) plus one loss entered by hand (1R).

→ 3R ≥ 2.5R: STAND DOWN · daily limit (your setting).

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoDaily loss limit · R (one unit of risk)

EXPIRED

What it reads
Something that was live no longer is: a session ended, a level stayed broken too long, or a plan ran out of time.
How it is computed
Each tool states its clock: session end, N bars broken with no reclaim (your setting), or a plan time limit.
Why that information matters
An expired object is history, so it stops competing for attention with what is still live.
What it does not tell you
Expiry is timekeeping. It says nothing about whether the level or plan would have worked.
Worked example

Retire after 30 bars. A prior-day low stays broken below for 30 closed bars with no reclaim.

→ On the 30th bar: EXPIRED.

Used byTE Session Boundaries, Opening Range and Initial Balance (TradingView) · TE Previous Session Structure (TradingView)

See alsoINVALIDATED · BROKEN BELOW

INVALIDATED

What it reads
The condition a setup or plan depended on has gone, so it is withdrawn.
How it is computed
Triggered by the plan’s own rule: a close back under its level, or an entry that never traded before the plan’s time ran out.
Why that information matters
It tells you the old plan no longer describes the chart, so its lines stop being references.
What it does not tell you
Invalidation is about the plan, not the market: price can still go anywhere afterwards.
Worked example

A plan armed at entry 5,001.00. The entry does not trade within 750 trading minutes.

→ After 750 minutes with no fill: INVALIDATED.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoEXPIRED · CONFIRMED · ARMED

ENTERED

What it reads
The plan’s entry price has traded, so the plan is now a position being managed.
How it is computed
Printed on the first bar after the plan armed whose high-low range contains the entry price.
Why that information matters
From here the stop and targets are live references, not a plan on paper.
What it does not tell you
A fill at the entry starts a trade. It says nothing about how it ends.
Worked example

Buy entry 5,001.00. A bar trades from 4,999.50 to 5,004.25.

→ The range contains 5,001.00: ENTERED.

See alsoTargets (T1, T2, T3) · STOPPED

Targets (T1, T2, T3)

Also written: T1 · T2 · T3 · target

What it reads
The prices a plan takes size off at, nearest first.
How it is computed
Taken from graded levels above the entry, nearest first, each rounded to the tick and stated in R from the entry.
Why that information matters
Targets at structure tie each exit to a price the market has already marked, not to a fixed multiple.
What it does not tell you
A target is a line on a plan. It does not say price will reach it.
Worked example

Entry 5,000.00, stop 4,992.00 (1R = 8.00). Graded levels at 5,016.00 and 5,026.50.

→ T1 5,016.00 = 2.0R. T2 5,026.50 = 3.3R.

Used byAPOLLO ONE

See alsoT1 HIT · R (one unit of risk) · No level 3R above

T1 HIT

What it reads
Price has reached the first target of a live position.
How it is computed
Printed on the first bar after the entry whose high reaches T1, for a plan to buy.
Why that information matters
It is where a plan’s management changes by its own rules: size comes off and the stop can move.
What it does not tell you
Reaching T1 says nothing about whether T2 is reached.
Worked example

Entry 5,000.00, T1 5,016.00. A bar trades up to 5,016.25.

→ T1 HIT on that bar.

See alsoT2 HIT · Targets (T1, T2, T3)

T2 HIT

What it reads
Price has reached the second target of a live position.
How it is computed
Printed on the first bar after T1 whose high reaches T2.
Why that information matters
It marks the plan’s second exit and what is left on as the runner.
What it does not tell you
It records a price that traded, not a statement about the rest of the trade.
Worked example

T2 5,026.50. A later bar trades 5,027.00.

→ T2 HIT. What remains is the runner.

See alsoRUNNER · T1 HIT

RUNNER

What it reads
The last part of a position left on after the earlier targets, managed toward the final one.
How it is computed
The size remaining after the T1 and T2 exits. Its stop follows the plan’s rules, and it ends at T3 or at that stop.
Why that information matters
It separates the part of a trade still exposed from the part already closed.
What it does not tell you
A runner is a size, not a promise of a further move.
Worked example

10 micros. The plan takes 6 off at T1 and 3 at T2.

→ 10 − 6 − 3 = 1 micro is the runner.

See alsoT2 HIT · CLOSED

CLOSED

What it reads
A position has been fully exited.
How it is computed
Printed when the remaining size reaches zero, whichever exit made it so.
Why that information matters
It marks the end of a position, so nothing on the chart is still exposed from that plan.
What it does not tell you
Closed says the position ended. On its own it does not say how.
Worked example

10 micros entered. 6 out at T1, 3 at T2, 1 at the runner’s stop.

→ 6 + 3 + 1 = 10: CLOSED.

See alsoRUNNER · STOPPED

STOPPED

What it reads
The plan’s stop price traded and the remaining position exited there.
How it is computed
Printed on the first bar whose low reaches the active stop, for a plan to buy. A fill can be worse than the stop price.
Why that information matters
It records the planned loss happening, which is what a daily loss limit counts.
What it does not tell you
A stop is a line on a plan. A gap can fill it at a worse price than the one written.
Worked example

Stop 4,992.00 at 1R. A bar trades down to 4,991.75.

→ STOPPED: −1R on the remaining size, before slippage.

See alsoDaily loss limit · STAND DOWN

Every worked example is arithmetic on the inputs it states, not a measurement and not a result. Formulas are the ones our tools compute. Exchanges set contract terms and can change them.

These words, printed on your own chart: APOLLO ONE and every premium tool, one membership.

$49.99/month, or $399/year. Monthly cancels whenever you want. Access goes to the TradingView username you give at checkout. The public tools stay free.

Secure checkout by Stripe. After you pay, access goes to the TradingView username you give at checkout (a free TradingView plan works), automatically within about 15 minutes, under Indicators → Invite-only scripts. How access works.

Free newsletter

The daily issue, in your inbox.

Today's recap, tomorrow's event clock, and what the desk is watching. Free, by email. Unsubscribe whenever you want.